Bahamian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bahamians

Lithuanians

Tragic
Excellent
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Bahamian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,757,371 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Lithuanians.
Bahamian Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 41.9%), median family income ($82,631 compared to $115,395, a difference of 39.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $105,223, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $53,552, a difference of 17.1%), median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $42,108, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $65,209, a difference of 27.9%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricBahamianLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,427
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,631
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,726
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,735
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,756
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,125
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,743
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,395
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,369
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,000
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
28.7%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 75.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 67.3%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.4%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricBahamianLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
9.7%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBahamianLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBahamianLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.8%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 37.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.10, a difference of 5.6%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBahamianLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.2%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.8%
Exceptional
29.6%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.3%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBahamianLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Average
6.3%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.87%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricBahamianLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Poor
95.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Bahamian vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), male disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Bahamian vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricBahamianLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.8%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%