Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,599,630 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $105,223, a difference of 27.9%), and per capita income ($39,529 compared to $49,448, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $42,108, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $65,209, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $53,552, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.87%).