Cuban vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cuban
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cubans

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Cuban Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,319,034 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Lithuanians.
Cuban Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Cuban vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $115,395, a difference of 35.8%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $65,209, a difference of 32.7%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $49,448, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $53,552, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $42,108, a difference of 20.5%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 23.6%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricCubanLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,383
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,981
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,392
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,619
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,580
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,942
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,655
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,483
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,301
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,152
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Tragic
28.7%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 88.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricCubanLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
9.7%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCubanLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.90%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCubanLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.5%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.6%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 33.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.5%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCubanLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.1%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
29.6%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCubanLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.3%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
6.0%
Average
6.3%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 75.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricCubanLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.6%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.9%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Cuban vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Cuban vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricCubanLithuanian
Disability
Average
11.7%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%