Swiss vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swiss
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swiss

Lithuanians

Good
Excellent
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Swiss Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 378,807,712 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Lithuanians.
Swiss Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Swiss vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,076 compared to $49,448, a difference of 12.2%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $42,108, a difference of 11.1%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $115,395, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $53,552, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $65,209, a difference of 5.8%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricSwissLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,076
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Good
$104,396
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Average
$85,681
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Average
$46,315
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,731
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,904
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,493
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,511
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$103,071
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,621
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
30.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.14%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricSwissLithuanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Fair
21.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwissLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.97%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwissLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.7%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.7%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwissLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
29.6%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwissLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
6.3%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricSwissLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.2%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Swiss vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Swiss vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricSwissLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%