Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Lithuanians

Fair
Excellent
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,683,687 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 103.2 Lithuanians.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $49,448, a difference of 18.6%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $115,395, a difference of 14.2%), and median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $61,228, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $65,209, a difference of 3.2%), and median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $42,108, a difference of 8.8%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.7%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (66.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
29.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
6.3%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%