Fijian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,226,343 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $49,448, a difference of 34.8%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $61,228, a difference of 34.3%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $115,395, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,552, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $65,209, a difference of 14.9%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $42,108, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.8%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), currently married (46.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 100.1%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 83.9%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.3%).