Slavic vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Lithuanians

Good
Excellent
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,830,143 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.490% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 490.0 Lithuanians.
Slavic Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Slavic vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $49,448, a difference of 9.8%), median family income ($105,144 compared to $115,395, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $112,484, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $65,209, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $53,552, a difference of 5.9%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricSlavicLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.7%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.47%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicLithuanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.81%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicLithuanian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
29.6%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Average
6.3%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Slavic vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Slavic vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricSlavicLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%