Immigrants vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,427,795 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.878. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $49,448, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($100,962 compared to $115,395, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.66%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $42,108, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $65,209, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.3%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 94.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.52%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.5%).