Cambodian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,359,240 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.870. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.264% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 263.6 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 11.2%), median female earnings ($45,014 compared to $42,108, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($53,386 compared to $50,991, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $112,484, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,148 compared to $105,223, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($117,780 compared to $115,395, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 10.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.2%).