Burmese vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Cypriots

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,029,845 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Cypriots.
Burmese Integration in Cypriot Communities

Burmese vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $54,899, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $52,209, a difference of 5.0%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $127,064, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($54,559 compared to $54,589, a difference of 0.060%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $102,843, a difference of 0.29%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $65,549, a difference of 0.48%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricBurmeseCypriot
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Burmese vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 7.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCypriot
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.9%

Burmese vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCypriot
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Burmese vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Burmese vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCypriot
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
27.0%

Burmese vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 61.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.2%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.0%

Burmese vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.9%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Burmese vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.80%).
Burmese vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCypriot
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%