Burmese vs Apache Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,346,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Apache.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $34,886, a difference of 49.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $82,184, a difference of 47.8%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $84,451, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,395, a difference of 10.9%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $34,895, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 111.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 107.3%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 30.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 94.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 90.1%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 51.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.46, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 79.6%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.3%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 81.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 62.1%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.2%).