Burmese vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Cambodians

Exceptional
Exceptional
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,127,189 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Cambodians.
Burmese Integration in Cambodian Communities

Burmese vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.4%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $96,324, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $66,892, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $45,014, a difference of 0.23%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $51,731, a difference of 0.53%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $55,571, a difference of 1.4%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricBurmeseCambodian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Average
25.8%

Burmese vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCambodian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.5%

Burmese vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCambodian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Burmese vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.98%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Burmese vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.6%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households (65.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.0%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCambodian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
26.7%

Burmese vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.7%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.5%

Burmese vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), college, under 1 year (71.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.0%), and college, 1 year or more (66.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.0%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Burmese vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Burmese vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCambodian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%