Burmese vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Hawaiians

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,208,208 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 18.3 Hawaiians.
Burmese Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Burmese vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $39,403, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $50,488, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $90,722, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,078, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $64,920, a difference of 9.6%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.6%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricBurmeseHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Excellent
24.9%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseHawaiian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.9%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.5%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.5%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.8%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseHawaiian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Poor
33.2%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 17.5%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.9%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 78.4%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Burmese vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Burmese vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseHawaiian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%