Burmese vs Danish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Danes

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Danish Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,569,517 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Danes within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 10.9 Danes.
Burmese Integration in Danish Communities

Burmese vs Danish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $37,730, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $44,095, a difference of 17.9%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $87,676, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,041, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $63,117, a difference of 12.7%).
Burmese vs Danish Income
Income MetricBurmeseDanish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Good
$44,095
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Excellent
$105,900
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Excellent
$87,676
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Average
$46,392
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Excellent
$56,246
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$37,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Excellent
$53,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Excellent
$97,221
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$105,619
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$63,117
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
31.0%

Burmese vs Danish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Burmese vs Danish Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseDanish
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.0%

Burmese vs Danish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.4%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Burmese vs Danish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseDanish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%

Burmese vs Danish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 29.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
Burmese vs Danish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseDanish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Burmese vs Danish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%).
Burmese vs Danish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseDanish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
51.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
50.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Burmese vs Danish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 46.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.7%).
Burmese vs Danish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseDanish
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
93.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
63.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Burmese vs Danish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Burmese vs Danish Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseDanish
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Good
1.9%

Burmese vs Danish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Danish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Burmese vs Danish Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseDanish
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%