Burmese vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,261,025 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 16.3 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($123,369 compared to $84,981, a difference of 45.2%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $49,152, a difference of 44.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $86,301, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $50,655, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $34,942, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 110.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 91.4%), master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 63.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.3%).