Burmese vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,875,223 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $32,345, a difference of 60.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $75,945, a difference of 59.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $71,697, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $59,383, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $44,003, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 87.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 74.8%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 193.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 149.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 148.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 78.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.7%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 125.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 97.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.28%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 63.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 48.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.5%).