Immigrants from Israel vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,210,107 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 0.4 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $44,206, a difference of 29.8%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $54,508, a difference of 26.1%), and median family income ($127,430 compared to $103,624, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $52,979, a difference of 5.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $62,215, a difference of 12.3%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 65.1%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.8%).