Immigrants from Peru vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,765,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.680% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 680.3 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $52,979, a difference of 6.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $101,171, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $87,446, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,534 compared to $103,624, a difference of 0.090%), median earnings ($47,025 compared to $46,952, a difference of 0.16%), and median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $54,508, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 19.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.6%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (46.4% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.8%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.0%).