Immigrants from Brazil vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,810,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 5.5 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.1%), per capita income ($48,164 compared to $44,206, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $54,508, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $62,215, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $52,979, a difference of 2.9%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $40,019, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.1%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.12%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.43%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.6%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.46%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).