Immigrants from Cuba vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,021,130 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $62,215, a difference of 39.1%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $103,624, a difference of 32.4%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $87,446, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $52,979, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $40,019, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 75.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.60%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.9%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 30.6%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (44.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.8%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 46.4%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.9%).