Immigrants from Fiji vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,288,367 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 167.8 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $52,979, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $96,497, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $54,508, a difference of 0.82%), median family income ($106,544 compared to $103,624, a difference of 2.8%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $46,952, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.8%), family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.88%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 54.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 53.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 36.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.62%).