Immigrants from Caribbean vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,231,360 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $62,215, a difference of 28.2%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $103,624, a difference of 24.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $101,171, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $52,979, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $40,019, a difference of 9.9%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $46,952, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 65.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and single female poverty (22.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.2%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.3%).