Immigrants from Moldova vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,643,215 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.712% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 712.2 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $54,508, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($47,489 compared to $44,206, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($50,274 compared to $46,952, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $62,215, a difference of 1.2%), median household income ($91,446 compared to $87,446, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $96,497, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%), associate's degree (50.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.66%), male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%).