Immigrants from Liberia vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,285,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 132.4 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 20.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $96,497, a difference of 19.3%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $87,446, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $40,019, a difference of 5.4%), median earnings ($42,923 compared to $46,952, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $52,979, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.61%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.76%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.4%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (62.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.27%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.5%).