Immigrants from Africa vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,262,190 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 5.6 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $96,497, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($83,289 compared to $87,446, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $40,019, a difference of 0.60%), median earnings ($46,564 compared to $46,952, a difference of 0.83%), and median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $54,508, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.51%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.55%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and associate's degree (46.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.34%).