Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,231,282 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 52.8 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $52,979, a difference of 14.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($108,544 compared to $103,624, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,952 compared to $40,019, a difference of 0.17%), median household income ($86,875 compared to $87,446, a difference of 0.66%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $96,497, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 25.7%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.49%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.63%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.7%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.2%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%).