Immigrants from Malaysia vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,705,851 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 56.3 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $54,508, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $44,206, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($52,514 compared to $46,952, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $52,979, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $62,215, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.2%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.8%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.5%).