Immigrants from El Salvador vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,132,083 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 6.0 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,394 compared to $44,206, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $54,508, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($92,545 compared to $103,624, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $52,979, a difference of 3.1%), householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $62,215, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($81,213 compared to $87,446, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.0%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.9%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 73.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.48%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%).