Guatemalan vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,911,317 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $49,173, a difference of 30.2%), median family income ($88,295 compared to $114,553, a difference of 29.7%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $60,350, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $42,542, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.5%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.20, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 95.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.6%).