Portuguese vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,307,129 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $49,173, a difference of 10.8%), median family income ($106,286 compared to $114,553, a difference of 7.8%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $60,350, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $104,578, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.7%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.40%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.33%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 53.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.0%).