Houma vs Mongolian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Mongolian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Mongolians
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mongolian Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,940,861 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Mongolians.
Houma vs Mongolian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $111,602, a difference of 54.8%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $114,553, a difference of 50.4%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $93,971, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $52,540, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $60,350, a difference of 19.4%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $51,038, a difference of 31.0%).
Income Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $49,173 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $114,553 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $93,971 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $51,038 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $60,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $42,542 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Good $52,540 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $104,578 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $111,602 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $65,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Poor 26.6% |
Houma vs Mongolian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 92.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 77.5%), and single father poverty (26.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.8%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Houma vs Mongolian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 81.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 48.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Houma vs Mongolian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Houma vs Mongolian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 66.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.61%), currently married (45.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Houma vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Tragic 87.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Houma vs Mongolian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 187.9%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 176.8%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 145.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.56%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 53.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Houma vs Mongolian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 84.6%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 78.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.7%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Mongolian |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |