Slavic vs Mongolian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Mongolians

Good
Good
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Mongolian Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,187,148 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Mongolians.
Slavic Integration in Mongolian Communities

Slavic vs Mongolian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $49,173, a difference of 9.2%), median family income ($105,144 compared to $114,553, a difference of 8.9%), and median household income ($86,398 compared to $93,971, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $65,326, a difference of 5.9%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Income
Income MetricSlavicMongolian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Exceptional
$49,173
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$114,553
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$93,971
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$51,038
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$60,350
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$42,542
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Good
$52,540
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Exceptional
$104,578
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$111,602
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$65,326
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Poor
26.6%

Slavic vs Mongolian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 13.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicMongolian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Average
12.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%

Slavic vs Mongolian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicMongolian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Slavic vs Mongolian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicMongolian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.3%

Slavic vs Mongolian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.2%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicMongolian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
27.9%

Slavic vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 46.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.7%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicMongolian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
13.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
87.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Tragic
18.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Slavic vs Mongolian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicMongolian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
53.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
19.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.8%

Slavic vs Mongolian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.5%).
Slavic vs Mongolian Disability
Disability MetricSlavicMongolian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%