Ethiopian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,283,494 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 22.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $104,578, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $111,602, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $65,326, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $42,542, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 12.6%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.18%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (61.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.4%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), female disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.49%).