Venezuelan vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,964,029 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Venezuelan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Venezuelans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Venezuelans corresponds to a decrease of 76.9 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,074 compared to $34,974, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($52,510 compared to $45,538, a difference of 15.3%), and median family income ($96,281 compared to $85,050, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,011 compared to $51,022, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,026 compared to $53,420, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 36.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.2%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 2.7%), married-couple households (47.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 58.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 81.9%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 71.7%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.8%).