Yakama vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,854,344 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 61.9 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $51,022, a difference of 6.5%), per capita income ($33,009 compared to $34,974, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $53,420, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($45,002 compared to $45,538, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,992 compared to $85,965, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $85,050, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 102.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and female unemployment (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (30.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.6%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 12.3%), associate's degree (32.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.9%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%).