Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,552,610 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 16.4 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $34,974, a difference of 54.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $80,012, a difference of 49.3%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $85,050, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,022, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $53,420, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 63.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 57.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.4%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 4.9%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 57.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 145.3%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 127.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 104.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.1%).