Tongan vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,537,072 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.492% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to a decrease of 492.3 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,235 compared to $53,420, a difference of 27.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $85,965, a difference of 26.4%), and median household income ($93,076 compared to $74,217, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $51,022, a difference of 11.7%), and median female earnings ($38,288 compared to $33,953, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 59.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.9%), single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and single father poverty (12.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.8%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.49 compared to 3.49, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (31.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households (69.6% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 58.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.7%).