Crow vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,548,337 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 27.3 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 29.3%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $74,217, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $85,965, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,707 compared to $39,762, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $33,953, a difference of 3.9%), and median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $45,538, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 89.2%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 69.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 196.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 196.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 193.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.1%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 4.6%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 120.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and kindergarten (99.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.97%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.9%).