Fijian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,484,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 140.1 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $53,420, a difference of 6.3%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $34,974, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $74,217, a difference of 0.020%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $80,012, a difference of 0.070%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $45,538, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.40%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and family households (65.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.4%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.7%), high school diploma (86.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and ged/equivalency (81.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.3%).