Yuman vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,612,879 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Yuman communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.107% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yuman corresponds to a decrease of 106.7 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,956 compared to $80,012, a difference of 9.7%), median family income ($78,055 compared to $85,050, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($68,743 compared to $74,217, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,933 compared to $51,022, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($45,446 compared to $45,538, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,110 compared to $53,420, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (28.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 77.3%), single male poverty (21.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 54.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (30.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother poverty (37.8% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 219.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (37.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 98.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (9.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 90.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (44.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.47 compared to 3.49, a difference of 0.81%), family households (69.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 66.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.50%), college, under 1 year (55.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (10.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and male disability (14.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%).