Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,178,846 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.196% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 196.3 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $53,420, a difference of 13.7%), per capita income ($39,558 compared to $34,974, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $33,953, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.90%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $51,022, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($79,509 compared to $74,217, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (23.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.3%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), female unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and family households (65.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.090%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 95.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 145.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.4%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 139.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.69%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 4.5%).