German Russian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,730,589 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 112.6 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,266 compared to $34,974, a difference of 15.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $51,022, a difference of 11.7%), and median family income ($93,858 compared to $85,050, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.070%), median household income ($75,856 compared to $74,217, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $53,420, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.0%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.99%), single female poverty (23.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.67%), currently married (45.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 21.5%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 97.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.9%).