South African vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,248,415 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.398% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 398.2 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $34,974, a difference of 43.1%), median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $45,538, a difference of 35.0%), and median family income ($113,229 compared to $85,050, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $51,022, a difference of 0.71%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $53,420, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 62.7%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.55%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (63.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 105.7%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 98.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 97.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 21.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%).