Peruvian vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,210,982 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.073% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to a decrease of 73.0 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,479 compared to $34,974, a difference of 27.2%), median family income ($105,444 compared to $85,050, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,886 compared to $80,012, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $51,022, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $53,420, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (67.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.3%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.1%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 53.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.4%).