Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,742,457 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $41,277, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,817, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $49,722, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $65,715, a difference of 1.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $109,446, a difference of 3.4%), and median family income ($116,942 compared to $112,038, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.51%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 73.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.8%).