Immigrants from Russia vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,967,837 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.373% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 373.1 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $39,403, a difference of 32.1%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $50,488, a difference of 25.4%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $43,673, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $64,920, a difference of 0.63%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $53,078, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.0%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.9%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 87.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 68.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 72.3%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.8%).