Immigrants from Russia vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,483,072 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $34,195, a difference of 52.2%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $44,010, a difference of 43.9%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $38,907, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $55,573, a difference of 0.57%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $53,077, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.4%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.9%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.81%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 102.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 59.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 49.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 137.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 127.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 105.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.8%).