Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,148,994 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 11.1 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $43,464, a difference of 19.7%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $53,237, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $92,876, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $52,643, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $59,848, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 22.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 47.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.34%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.49%).