Immigrants from Russia vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,213,227 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $42,792, a difference of 21.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $91,368, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $53,967, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,028, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $58,243, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.81%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.55%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.39%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%).