Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,731,364 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Immigrants from Italy.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $48,654, a difference of 7.0%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $59,691, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $50,581, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.35%), householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $64,065, a difference of 0.70%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $110,434, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.36%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.64%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 10.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.69%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 37.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.7%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.53%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).